Action catalogue · message.send.bulk
May an AI agent «Trigger bulk send»?
Catalogue as of: · Jurisdictions: Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Italy
Short answer
Yes. «Trigger bulk send» requires no statutory form in any of the four jurisdictions — an agent may perform the action alone within its mandate. The mandate sets the limits: amount, counterparty, frequency, time window.
Form requirement by country
| Country | Form requirement | Consequence for the agent |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | no form required | no statutory form — the mandate sets the limits |
| Germany | no form required | no statutory form — the mandate sets the limits |
| Austria | no form required | no statutory form — the mandate sets the limits |
| Italy | no form required | no statutory form — the mandate sets the limits |
Properties in the catalogue
- Agent capability
- execute
- Reversible
- no — final
- Risk level
- 3 of 3
- Human approval recommended
- yes — add to escalateActions
Legal basis
Art. 3 lit. o UWG (CH) · § 7 UWG (DE) — Einwilligung
Frequently asked questions
May an AI agent «Trigger bulk send» in Switzerland?
Yes, within the mandate. In Switzerland the action requires no form required; human approval (escalation) is recommended because it is irreversible or takes effect immediately.
May an AI agent «Trigger bulk send» in Germany?
Yes, within the mandate. In Germany the action requires no form required; human approval (escalation) is recommended because it is irreversible or takes effect immediately.
May an AI agent «Trigger bulk send» in Austria?
Yes, within the mandate. In Austria the action requires no form required; human approval (escalation) is recommended because it is irreversible or takes effect immediately.
May an AI agent «Trigger bulk send» in Italy?
Yes, within the mandate. In Italy the action requires no form required; human approval (escalation) is recommended because it is irreversible or takes effect immediately.
Not legal advice. The information comes from the action catalogue from which the Mandact engine derives its decisions; in an individual case the applicable law decides.